close

Myrtdi

Godzilla in USA

Shin-Godzilla

Kaiju Daisenso
(War of the Monsters)
International Title: The Invasion of the Astro-Monsters
Released: December 19, 1965
Running time: 94 minutes

Monster Zero
Released: July 29, 1970 by UPA/Saperstein Productions
Running time: 93 minutes

The Japanese Pop Culture in America is formally available as Godzilla vs. Monster Zero from Simitar Home Video.

History Vortex and Monster Zero marks the first time that Toho united their already popular themes of outer space invasions (The Mysterians 1957, Battle in Outer Space, 1959) with giant monster wars (King Kong vs. Godzilla, Godzilla vs. the Thing, Ghidrah, the Three-Headed Monster) into one movie. The result was another popular entry in the Godzilla series. The formula of alien invasion would be employed again in Destroy All Monsters, and over-used from Godzilla vs. Gigan (1972) to Terror of MechaGodzilla (1975).

Some fans consider Monster Zero as a sequel to Ghidrah, the Three-Headed Monster. At first glance, there is less that connects Monster Zero to Ghidrah than Ghidrah to Godzilla vs. the Thing. The main factor that links Monster Zero to Ghidrah is reference to King Ghidorah’s defeat by Godzilla and Rodan (with Mothra’s participation conveniently overlooked). However, more subtle connections can be read between both films. First is the reference at the beginning of Monster Zero by Dr. Sakurai (Jun Tazaki), that Planet X is the source of “strange magnetic waves” aimed at the Earth. This line connects with the opening of Ghidrah where the Earth is experiencing a strange winter heat wave, a plot point which is never explained in that film. It thus can be inferred that the X-Seijins were attempting to conquer the Earth, controlling King Ghidorah all the time. Second, Namikawa’s (Kumi Mizuno) betrayal of her own people by giving Glen (Nick Adams) the secret of their weakness suggest that not all X-Seijins were emotionless and thus supportive of the Controller’s plans. Thus another inference is that the “Martians” (Venusians) who controlled the princess were really X-Seijin resistance fighters, using their powers to warn the Earth of the impending invasion through the princess. Finally, there is the fact that the X-Seijins already know about King Ghidorah’s defeat at the hands of Godzilla and Rodan, which suggests an imitate knowledge of past events. When these factors are considered, the two films fit nicely together and give some reason behind the random chain of events that took place in Ghidrah.

Unlike Ghidrah, Monster Zero was virtually unscathed for American release. That Monster Zero had an American co-producer, Henry G. Saperstein, could be why this film suffered little in the Americanization process. Scant footage was trimmed from Monster Zero, and among this was:

– Yoshio Tsuchiya, who portrayed the Controller of Planet X, wrote for himself three lines in X-Seijin, all of which were snipped from the American version. The first line was during a quick conversation with one of the (off-screen) personnel at the Hydrogen-Oxide plant. The second line is spoken after Astronauts Glen and Fuji (Akira Takarada) leave Planet X; the Controller sneers in X-Seijin, in the American version, this was dubbed over with an evil laugh. The third occasion is after the skirmish between Godzilla, Rodan and King Ghidorah on Planet X; when the Controller notices that Glen and Fuji (Akira Takarada) are missing from the control room, he stands, presses buttons on the control panel and issues orders in X-Seijin.

– An overhead shot of Japanese troops running across a stream as the X-Seijin saucers land at Lake Myojin was removed.

– A ground-level shot of the X-Seijin saucers carrying Godzilla and Rodan away from Earth was deleted.

– When a group of X-Seijins lose track of Glen and Fuji at an X-Seijin elevator, the scene continued with one of the X-Seijins turning and issuing commands to the others. – When Dr. Sakurai retrieves the plans for the A-Cycle Light Ray from a filing cabinet, a shot of the document cover in Japanese was snipped.

Additional changes included the deletion of newspaper headlines and office signs in Japanese characters. Alternatively, English translations for newspaper headlines announcing the threat of Planet X were inserted.

Some of the sound effects were also re-mixed, notably during the infamous “Godzilla Shie” (jig) after King Ghidorah’s first defeat. In the Japanese version, we only hear Godzilla’s roar. The Americanization improved this comical bit by dubbing in thundering sounds to accompany Godzilla’s “victory dance”.

Incidentally, the opening title in the Japanese version dates Monster Zero as occurring in the year “198X”. UPA translated the title but did not give a date to the film.

While the visuals were nearly left intact, the music was not spared from tampering. Ifukube’s famous Kaiju Daisenso march suffered. This is one of Ifukube’s oldest and most popular themes; a precursor was used in Godzilla, King of the Monsters (1954), again in Battle in Outer Space (1959), and a new arrangement (from the famous “Ostinato” recording in 1986) was employed in Godzilla vs. Biollante (1989). The Japanese version of Monster Zero opens with a blast of this triumphant theme. The Americanization replaced this theme with the same track when Godzilla and Rodan are recovered from hibernation by the X-Seijin saucers. Though the Kaiju Daisenso march is a wonderfully stirring score, the substituted piece for the American version works better and sets a proper mood for the movie. However, the same cannot be said of the tampering with the Kaiju Daisenso theme at the climax, when the A-Cycle Light Ray cannons are unleashed against the X-Seijin saucers. In the Japanese version, this theme runs three minutes and thunders on the soundtrack. In the American version, this piece was reduced to two minutes, was muffled and re-mixed with the opening Japanese track. This disastrous re-editing dampened the impact of Earth’s victory against the X-Seijins and their monsters (in the American version, it is possible to hear the final note of the Kaiju Daisenso march in the scene where Fuji and Dr. Sakurai recoil in shock at two exploding X-Seijin saucers).

The dubbing ranges from mediocre to good. Especially well-dubbed is the Controller of Planet X, but the X-Seijin colonial commander, in the words of Greg Shoemaker from Japanese Fantasy Film Journal sounds like he was dubbed at the “Snidely Whiplash School of Voice”. Some of the voices for the minor characters come across unintentionally funny as well. In the Japanese version, Nick Adams was dubbed in Japanese, though he went undubbed for the Japanese theatrical trailer. Interestingly, in the American version Adams refers to Rodan by his Japanese name Radon (RA-don).

Monster Zero was released in the United States in 1970, a year after Destroy All Monsters received its’ domestic release. Considering the involvement of Saperstein, the reasons for the five-year delay are open to speculation. One possibility could have been Nick Adams’ sudden death in 1967. Monster Zero comprised the second half of a double-bill with War of the Gargantuas (1966), another Saperstein film that took four years to reach American shores.

Monster Zero was one of the first Godzilla films to be released in the U.S. on videocassette. Paramount Home Video changed the title to the more marketable Godzilla vs. Monster Zero, and made some changes during the opening credits; the jeweled background for “A Toho Co. Ltd.-Henry G. Saperstein Enterprises Production” was replaced by a black background, while the production credits were completely redone via video correction. This is why the packaging for the Paramount re-release of Godzilla vs. Monster Zero states “Special Home Video Version”, to indicate that there are differences from the theatrical print. In 1998, Monster Zero was released on DVD, offering both cropped-and-scanned and letterboxed versions of the film. Worth noting is that the letterboxed version bears the original title Monster Zero.

The Godzilla films reached a peak with Godzilla vs. the Thing, Ghidrah, the Three-Headed Monster and Monster Zero. Yet after the last film, the series went into a slow decline. The story lines would remain of high caliber for the next two films, Godzilla vs. the Sea Monster and Son of Godzilla, and to a certain extent in Destroy All Monsters. But the SPFX and overall production values began to drop, and the following films would lack the creative energy from this period. A reason for this decline was that Ishiro Honda and Akira Ifukube were not involved in the next two entries, while Eji Tsuburaya began to take a less active role in directing the SPFX, partially due to involvement with his own Tsuburaya Productions, partially due to his health. Many genre enthusiasts maintain that Monster Zero saw the passing of the “Golden Age” in the history of the King of the Monsters.

read more

Godzilla in America

Godzilla54Poster
A Critical Comparison between the Japanese and American Versions of the Godzilla Films by John Rocco Roberto and Robert Biondi (Originally published in G-FAN Issue #10 July/August 1994) Revised edition published in KAIJU-FAN # 5 Summer 1997 Gojira Released on November 3, 1954 Running time: 98 minutes Godzilla, King of the Monsters! Released on September 17, 1956 by Transworld Pictures
read more

Anatomy of a Dalek

KEY TO ILLUSTRATION 1. THE EYE STICK - This incorporates a wide-angle lens that transmits images to a screen within the control chamber. It is mounted on a pivoting arm that protrudes from the Dalek's head section. The head is capable of turning a full 360 degrees providing the Dal mutant with complete all-round vision. The eye is capable of
read more

Dalek Hierarchy

DeadPlanetDalekComp
A look at the Command Structure of the Dalek Empire by John Rocco Roberto   Warrior Daleks: The Warrior/Worker Dalek is the most common type, and all Daleks follow the same basic design from this. During the 1960s their outer casing were silver, changing over to various shades of gray beginning in the 1970s. The exterior of the early Dalek
read more

Kaiju Conversations

KawakitaPhoto1
An Interview with Koichi Kawakita Conducted by David Milner Translation by Yohihiko Shibata Conducted by David Milner Translation by Yohihiko Shibata   Koichi Kawakita directed the special effects for GODZILLA VS. BIOLLANTE (1989), GODZILLA VS. GHIDRAH (1991), GODZILLA VS. MOTHRA (1992), GODZILLA VS. MECHAGODZILLA (1993), GODZILLA VS. SPACE GODZILLA (1994), and a number of other science fiction films. He also
read more

The Flatiron Building (1903)

The Birth of the
American Skyscraper

FlatironBuilding2The Flatiron Building (1903)
175 Fifth Avenue at East 23rd Street
New York City

The Skyscraper, modern American cities are defined by them. Their towering spires and intricate shapes, the word itself brings to mind the steel and glass towers which climb thousands of feet into the sky. While most Americans look upon the Sears Tower, World Trade Center or Empire State Building as the ultimate achievement of modern skyscraper design, it is a modest twenty story building, built in a section of the city which, at the turn of the century was considered “uptown”, that holds the distinction of having starting it all; The Flatiron Building. Built at the intersection of Broadway and Fifth Avenue by Daniel H. Burnham, the Flatiron Building conforms to the triangular plot of land which marks the intersection of East 23rd Street. At twenty stories tall the building quickly became a symbol of the skyscraper era and is considered the nations first true skyscraper. A rusticated limestone facade build on a steel frame, the building, when viewed from the north, “resembled a ship sailing up the Avenue.” (From Architectural Record # 12 (1902); 128-36 Seth M. Scheiner) Despite the far taller buildings that were later built, having survived the wrecking ball and modernization of the Broadway/Fifth Avenue section of the city, the Flatiron Building remains one of the few surviving examples of early 20th century technology, and the perfect example of early 1900’s architectural composition.

The Design

An American architectural movement, based in the late 19th-century Chicago and identified with that city as The Chicago School, was the adherents of which produced the skyscraper, the first true manifestation of modern architecture. In 1855 the architect-engineer William Le Baron Jenney built the ten story Home Insurance Building in Chicago, employing for the first time an all metal skeleton of cast iron columns and steel beams to support the masonry shell of floors and walls, thus creating the prototype of all skyscraper design.

Four young architects, Louis Sullivan, Daniel Burnham, William Holabird, and Martin Roche, who worked in Jenney’s Chicago office, became leaders of the movement. As partners, Holabird and Roche created such significant steel-framed structures as the Tacoma Building (1889, demolished 1925), while Burnham and John Wellborn Root formed a brilliant architectural firm that built such landmark office buildings as the Rookery (1886), the Monadnock Building (1891), and the Reliance Building (1895). But it would be Daniel Burnham who would achieve fame by designing New York City’s famed triangular skyscraper, the Flatiron (originally Fuller) Building in 1902. Sullivan, however, eventually became acknowledged as the genius of the group, joining with the architect Dankmar Adler to build such masterpieces as the Auditorium Building (1890), combining a hotel, an office tower, and an acoustically perfect theater, and the Wainwright Building (1891) in Saint Louis, the epitome of the style in combination of cleanly functional structure and graceful terra-cotta and metal embellishment. On his own Sullivan created the Schlesinger and Meyer Store (1899-1904), with unadorned glass and steel walls set off by a series of richly foliate metal panels adorning the street-floor facade. The Chicago School’s tenets of functional clarity and organic decoration were carried on by Sullivan’s pupil Frank Loyd Wright, who became one of the greatest architects of the 20th century.

The Architect

Daniel Hudson Burnham was born in Henderson New York in 1846 Along with his partner John Wellborn Root they became the leaders of the Chicago School, with Burnham acting as administrator while Root was the designer. Their many commissions in Chicago included the Masonic Temple (1890), which was then the tallest building in the world. They also helped to plan the 1893 World Columbian Exposition in Chicago, but Root died before the project was completed. In addition to the Flatiron Building, Burnham was also a member of the commission to enhance Washington D.C. Besides the famous Burnham plan for Chicago of 1909 (a urban renewal plain for reconstructing sections of Chicago’s older districts), he also designed notable plans for the cities of Baltimore, Buffalo, Cleveland, and San Francisco and was commissioned to do plans for Manila and other cities in the Philippines. Burnham passed away in 1912, at the age of 56.

The Building

The Flatiron or Fuller Building was erected in 1903, construction having begun the year before in 1902. It quickly gained the distinction of becoming Americas first true skyscraper. At 285 feet this twenty (20) story high building quickly became a midtown landmark, stretching 19th century technology in construction to its limits. Built on a steel frame and covered with non-load-bearing masonry, the facade was designed to resemble a classical pillar, with ornate scrolling and a protruding ornamented base and top. It was financed by Colorado gold miner Nathan Fuller¹, who struck it rich and decided to invest in New York City with this building. It’s unique triangular shape, resembling the shape of an old style iron, gave the building it’s nickname “Flatiron” and subsequently the name stuck. Its 24 levels, including a sub-basement, mezzanine, and attic, housed three shops, a barber shop, over two hundred offices, six Otis water-hydraulic elevators, and two main boiler systems to provide heating throughout the building. Although the building has seen better times in the last 93 years, the barber shop as well as the other shops have since closed, the building still remains a prime draw for New York City office space, and continues to employ 19th century technology in its daily function.

The Elevator System

Although primitive elevators operated by human and animal power or by water wheels were in use as early as the 3rd century BC, the modern power elevator is largely a product of the 19th century. Most elevators of the 19th century were powered by steam engines, either directly or through some form of hydraulic drive. In the early 19th century hydraulic plunger elevators were used in some European factories. In this type of elevator the car is mounted on a hollow steel plunger that drops into a cylinder sunk into the ground. Water or some other fluid forced into the cylinder under pressure raises the plunger and car, which fall by gravity when the fluid is released. In early installations the main valve controlling the flow of liquid was operated by hand by means of a rope running vertically through the car. Lever control and pilot valves regulating acceleration and deceleration were later improvements, but the relatively low speeds of this design, 75 feet per minute, made this system impractical for any height over 5 stories.

Powered elevators in the United States began in 1850, when a crude freight hoist operating between two adjacent floors was installed in a New York City building. In 1853, at the New York Crystal Palace exposition, American inventor and manufacture Elisha Otis exhibited an elevator equipped with a device called a safety to stop the fall of the car if the hoisting rope broke. In this event a spring would operate two pawls on the car, forcing them into engagement racks at the side of the shaft so as to support the car. This invention gave impetus to elevator construction. In these late 19th century elevators, a steam engine was connected by belt and gears to a revolving drum on which the hoisting ropes were wound. In the 1870s the rope-geared hydraulic elevator was introduced by Elisha Otis’ company, The Otis Elevator Company. The plunger was replaced in this type of elevator by a relatively short piston moving in a cylinder that was mounted, either vertically or horizontally, within the building. The effective length of the stroke of the piston was multiplied by a system of ropes and sheaves. Because of its smoother operation and greater speed and efficiency, the roped-hydraulic elevator generally replaced the type with a rope wound on a revolving drum.

The elevators within the Flatiron Building are of the roped-hydraulic type, with 5 to 1 (5:1) roping. Water was pumped into the cylinder by a series of steam pumps. A rope, traveling vertically through the elevator car the length of the hoistway, is activated by a hand lever to open the two main valves and determine direction. Pulling down on the rope allows water to flood the cylinder, raising the piston which is attached to a series of counterweights with a series of sheaves mounted on top of them. This action would lower the car through the hoistway, as the direction of travel of the piston was in direct oppersistion to the direction of travel to the car. In 5:1 roping the hoist ropes, which consist of four (4) 3/4 inch traction steel ropes, wrap around a series of five sheaves before being attached to the cross head at the top of the car. This allows the car to obtain great speeds without having to employ a long piston within the cylinder. A device called an Angle Clamp, mounted inside the car and activated by the hand lever, is closed as the car is approaching the desired floor. The clamp grabs hold of the operating rope pulling it up (or down), closing the main valve and stopping the elevator. To ascend the operator operates the lever in the opposite direction pulling up on the rope, opening the release valve and allowing gravity to pull the piston and counterweights back into the cylinder, thus rising the car through the hoistway.

Although improvements in winding drum type elevators and the invention of the traction type elevator in the early 1900s replaced the roped-hydraulic elevator, the water hydraulic system in use at the Flatiron Building is one of the few systems of this type still in operation to this date. The current system, which was modernized in 1950, and then again in 1989 to eliminate the hand lever² and add automatic controls, employs six pumping units of 75 horse power, 208 volts each, and is capable of lifting 2,000lbs through the hoistway at a speed of 400 feet per minute. Unfortunately, due to the nature of the system and the preventive maintaince needed to maintain its great age, the elevator systems are currently undergoing replacement with the more practical computerized gearless-traction type elevator system.

The Building In American Culture

The Flatiron Building’s architectural composition has been copied many time in many cities within the United States. The building, however, holds the distinction of being the only building within the United States built in the middle of a metropolitan area to face the grave sight of a Civil War veteran. His grave is located in a small plot of land marked by a monument between Fifth Avenue and Broadway at West 25th street. The building also has the distinction of contributing to American culture. Its tapered structure creates unusual wind currents at ground level. Back in the 1920s police officers were posted at the building to prevent men gathering to watch the wind raise the skirts of women passing on the 23rd street side. The cry they gave to warn off voyeurs “23 skidoo!” has since passed into American culture.

Endnotes:

¹ This fact can not be confirmed, and the name of the investor may have been lost to time. The name Nathan Fuller was found on a copy of a New York City visitors guide dated around 1925. It is included here as a point of reference only. Also, as the building was not constructed with the knowledge that it would become the first skyscraper, information on its construction and financing is limited. Building built around this time period were expected to last only 20-30 years, attested by the fact that most of the buildings designed by Jenney and his associates have been pulled down.

read more

Godzilla and the Second World War

15gozillaimg-blog427
A Study of the Allegorical Meaning in "Godzilla" and "Godzilla Raids Again." The Beginning Tomoyuki Tanaka sat in his seat during the flight back to Tokyo a worried man. Ordinary looking, having inherited the short stocky build characteristic of many Japanese men, he had just celebrated the passing of his forty-fourth birthday, and was about to celebrate his tenth year
read more

Chapter Nine

Genesis of the Daleks - The Vortex Crystal
Genesis of the Daleks - The Vortex Crystal History Vortex offers you is a theory that says that if time travel were possible, it would be impossible to change the major events of history. That while it might be possible to change the small events (keep someone from dying in an auto accident, prevent someone from getting on a doom
read more

The Five Lives of King Ghidorah

KingGhidorah92
Conceived by Hate. Born in Space. How Godzilla’s Greatest Nemesis Went From Villain to Hero. Here you have a post about Japanese Pop Culture in America. It is safe to say, without fear of contradiction, that King Ghidorah is the greatest foe Godzilla has ever faced. After Godzilla and Mothra, King Ghidorah is the most popular monster in Toho’s stable
read more

Godzilla in America

GigantisPoster (1).jpg
A Critical Comparison between the Japanese and American Versions of the Godzilla Films Gojira no Gyakushu (Godzilla's Counterattack) Released: April 24, 1955 Running time: 82 minutes Gigantis, the Fire Monster Released: May 21, 1959 by Warner Bros. Running time: 78 minutes Formerly available as "Godzilla Raids Again" from Video Treasures The enormous success of Gojira (Godzilla, King of the Monsters!
read more
1 2 3 4
Page 1 of 4